Team Hidden Change Barriers

Your team may be experiencing the same change differently.

Bring those perspectives together without turning individual responses into an employee report. Each participant receives a confidential individual readout. The team experience uses protected team-level information.

Choose a team option →See what the team experience looks like

Your personal assessment information stays private.

Your individual responses and individual readout are not shared with your team coordinator, manager, other participants, or your organization without your authorization. Your name and email address do not appear on your PDF readout.

How the team experience works

01Add participant emails

02One shared team link

03Private individual assessments and readouts

04Participation tracked, then team output

The team coordinator can see participation status. They cannot see individual responses or individual readouts.

Choose the team format

Team Readout Session

For teams that need a protected way to compare perspectives and decide where to focus next, with facilitation rather than a written team report.

Each participant receives a confidential individual readout.
Change Collaboration facilitates the team conversation.
No written team-level analysis is included.

3–5 people$500 →6–10 people$1,000 →11–20 people$2,000 →

Team Pattern Readout

For teams that want a written advisory view of recurring themes, meaningful differences, and what may deserve attention next.

Each participant receives a confidential individual readout.
Team-level findings are privacy-protected.
The written output does not identify who said what.

3–5 people$750 →6–10 people$1,500 →11–20 people$2,500 →

Privacy-protected team output

Useful patterns without turning people into data points.

A Team Pattern Readout is not a roster of comments or a participant-by-participant comparison. It focuses on what the protected team-level information supports.

Illustrative team preview

The strongest useful pattern

The team appears to share the same intended outcome while experiencing different levels of clarity about how decisions travel across functions.

Where perspectives align

Team-level advisory language without named participant results.

Where the evidence remains mixed

Team-level advisory language without named participant results.

What may be easy to miss

Team-level advisory language without named participant results.

A practical next conversation

Team-level advisory language without named participant results.

Illustrative, sanitized example. It is not based on a real team.

Still deciding?

The detailed FAQ explains invitations, access codes, participation tracking, confidentiality, timing, and what each team option includes.

View the detailed FAQ